Publication Info
Type Inproceedings
Year 2007
Venue Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST). New Orleans, USA. April 15 - 18, 2007.
Quick Navigation
Inproceedings

Investigating the existence of interactivity in various instructional settings

Kahveci M

2007 — Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST). New Orleans, USA. April 15 - 18, 2007.

All Publications

Citation (APA)

Kahveci M (2007). Investigating the existence of interactivity in various instructional settings. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST). New Orleans, USA. April 15 - 18, 2007.

Abstract

Although there is no agreement as to what interactivity and interaction mean in educational literature,

researchers are in agreement that both terms are vital for teaching and learning one way or another. As a part of a larger study, this paper focuses on faculty members’ perceptions about the existence of interactivity in various instructional settings. The sample (N=2669) consists of faculty members at colleges of education at randomly selected universities around the world.

On the factor solutions Textbook, Use of Computer, and Classroom, an eight-way factorial ANOVA (General Linear Model) was performed to elaborate the differentiations and tendencies of the faculty members’ perceptions over eight predictors: gender, age, highest degree obtained, research interest in interactivity, present status, learning preference, geographical region, and department.

BibTeX

@inproceedings{as, title = {Investigating the existence of interactivity in various instructional settings}, author = {Kahveci M}, year = {2007}, booktitle = {Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST). New Orleans, USA. April 15 - 18, 2007.}, abstract = {Although there is no agreement as to what interactivity and interaction mean in educational literature, researchers are in agreement that both terms are vital for teaching and learning one way or another. As a part of a larger study, this paper focuses on faculty members’ perceptions about the **existence of interactivity in various instructional settings**. The sample (N=2669) consists of faculty members at colleges of education at randomly selected universities around the world. On the factor solutions **Textbook, Use of Computer, and Classroom**, an eight-way factorial ANOVA (General Linear Model) was performed to elaborate the differentiations and tendencies of the faculty members’ perceptions over eight predictors: gender, age, highest degree obtained, research interest in interactivity, present status, learning preference, geographical region, and department.} }