Publication Info
| Type | Article |
| Year | 2025 |
| Venue | J. Sci. Pub., 56(2): 320-376. |
| DOI | 10.3138/jsp-2024-1118 |
Quick Navigation
Artificial Intelligence and Academic Integrity: Legislate or Educate?
2025 — J. Sci. Pub., 56(2): 320-376.
Citation (APA)
Abstract
This participatory action research (PAR) study, conducted at a Midwestern U.S. university, aimed to bridge the gap between generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools and academic integrity. Using mixed methods, researchers analyzed participants’ perceptions and strategies for using GenAI tools while upholding academic integrity.
The study highlighted the institution’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and challenges in grappling with the issue, pointing to the need for the critical use of GenAI tools and clear guidelines. The findings contribute to the field by providing strategies to empower educators and learners in navigating the ethical landscape of GenAI in education.
BibTeX
@article{j,
title = {Artificial Intelligence and Academic Integrity: Legislate or Educate?},
author = {Wan G, Grassi M, Golden T, Barnes T, Kahveci M, Wan X, Colacchio B},
year = {2025},
journal = {J. Sci. Pub., 56(2): 320-376.},
doi = {10.3138/jsp-2024-1118},
abstract = {This **participatory action research** (PAR) study, conducted at a Midwestern U.S. university, aimed to bridge the gap between **generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools and academic integrity**. Using mixed methods, researchers analyzed participants’ **perceptions and strategies** for using GenAI tools while upholding academic integrity.
The study highlighted the institution’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and challenges in grappling with the issue, pointing to the need for the **critical use of GenAI tools** and clear guidelines. The findings contribute to the field by providing strategies to **empower educators and learners** in navigating the ethical landscape of GenAI in education.}
}